Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight308 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range786 km488 mi
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score84/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 786km488mi Calculated | 721km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,756mm187in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 4.0 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 786 km 488 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 721 km 448 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 786 km 488 mi | 721 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 69 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























