Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

AMG C 63 S V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    308 hp/t
    230 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    195 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    786 km
    488 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510hp380kW
510hp380kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
1,655kg3,649lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
46.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
11.1s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton
Calculated
333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
786km488mi
Calculated
721km448mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,756mm187in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,609mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
435L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
80L
CO2 emissions
195g/km
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V85,500-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.1 s
14.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
205 km/h
127 mph
189 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
786 km
488 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
721 km
448 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
4.0 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
786 km
488 mi
721 km
448 mi
CO2 score
195 g/km
264 g/km
Trunk score
435 L
15.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8

  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 69 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster