Maserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed267 km/h166 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions207 g/km
- Best estimated range899 km559 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 899km559mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,971mm196in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,945mm77in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 207g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 899 km 559 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 5.5 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 899 km 559 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 207 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Is 45 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























