Maserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017 3.0 V6vsMaserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Ghibli II
2.0 24V Biturbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed267 km/h166 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,365kg3,009lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 899km559mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,971mm196in | 4,223mm166in |
| Width | 1,945mm77in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,514mm99in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 420L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 207g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 6,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 171 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 has 44 hp more than Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 5.5 s |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 and Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 5.5 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.7 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0 V6 | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 899 km 559 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 207 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0 V6
- Has 44 hp more
- Has 127 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























