Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6vsJaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X300)
6.0 V12 Lang
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range816 km507 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 311hp232kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,395kg5,280lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 816km507mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 5,993cc366cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 5,149mm203in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,314mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 234g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 5,350 rpm | 2,850 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 311 hp 232 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 has 29 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 816 km 507 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 311 hp 232 kW | 7.2 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 311 hp 232 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 816 km 507 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 234 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Has 29 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
- Has 25 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























