Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

3.0 V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2017
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

3.0 V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    204 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    860 km
    535 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340hp254kW
340hp254kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,865kg4,112lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
68.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
20.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
860km535mi
Calculated
816km507mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
505L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
80L
CO2 emissions
204g/km
234g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V66,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
20.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
113 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
1,865 kg
4,112 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V65.4 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V66.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
860 km
535 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
816 km
507 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
5.4 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
860 km
535 mi
816 km
507 mi
CO2 score
204 g/km
234 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6

  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
Jaguar XJ (X351) 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
3.0 V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0 V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
3.0 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
3.0 V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
3.0 V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.0 V6
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
3.0 V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0 V6
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6vsJaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6
3.0 V6
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster