Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T6vsJaguar XF (X260) 30d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
30d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,803 kg3,975 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T6 | JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,803kg3,975lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | 1,119km695mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 885L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 177g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T6 | JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 1,803 kg 3,975 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 1,119 km 695 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T6 | JaguarXF (X260)30d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,803 kg 3,975 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | 1,119 km 695 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 177 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 | Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) 30d V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 329 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























