Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsStelato S9 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonStelato S9
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,744 kg3,845 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Stelato S9 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful309 hp230 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | StelatoS9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 309hp230kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 396Nm292lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 2,246kg4,952lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,651kg5,844lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 214 km/h133 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 51.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 796km494mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 5,160mm203in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,486mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,050mm120in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,706mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,738mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 375L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | StelatoS9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 214 km/h133 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 309 hp 230 kW |
Stelato S9 100 kWh has 9 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Stelato S9 100 kWh: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 396 Nm 292 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 2,246 kg 4,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 214 km/h133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.1 s |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Stelato S9 100 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| StelatoS9100 kWh | 309 hp 230 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 214 km/h133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| StelatoS9100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | StelatoS9100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 309 hp 230 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 396 Nm 292 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 214 km/h133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 2,246 kg 4,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 796 km 494 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 375 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 502 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 84 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Stelato S9 100 kWh
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























