Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 E 220dvsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,179 km732 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,490kg5,490lb | - |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 893km555mi Calculated | 1,179km732mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,935mm194in | 4,962mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 448L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,474L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 7.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.6 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 893 km 555 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,179 km 732 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 893 km 555 mi | 1,179 km 732 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 92 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























