Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 20dvsVolvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,269 km789 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)20d | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.1s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,269km789mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)20d | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.1 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 20d and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 8.4 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 20d and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 20d and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,269 km 789 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)20d | VolvoS902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,269 km 789 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 20d | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 172 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 448 km (279 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























