Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,341 km834 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk510 L
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 38.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,341km834mi Calculated | 1,310km814mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,538mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 38.0 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 13 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,341 km 834 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,310 km 814 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,341 km 834 mi | 1,310 km 814 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























