Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 56.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 25.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,200km746mi Calculated | 673km418mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 25.7 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 241 hp 180 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,200 km 746 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 673 km 418 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 241 hp 180 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,200 km 746 mi | 673 km 418 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 527 km (327 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























