Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 22.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km517mi Calculated | 1,200km746mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 22.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,200 km 746 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 517 mi | 1,200 km 746 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 369 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























