Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014

3.5 V6

250 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,072 km
    666 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
346Nm255lb-ft
Curb weight
1,685kg3,715lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight-
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
59.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
27.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,072km666mi
Calculated
753km468mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,850mm191in
Width-
1,825mm72in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,565mm62in
Trunk volume
540L
483L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
70L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
215g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V66,200 rpm4,700 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
27.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
346 Nm
255 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
1,540 kg
3,395 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V67.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,072 km
666 mi
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
753 km
468 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
483 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.6 s
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
346 Nm
255 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.1 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
483 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
1,072 km
666 mi
753 km
468 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
215 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
483 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 19 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 320 km (199 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 57 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 56 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 3.5 V6

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6vsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
3.5 V6
3.5i V6
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6vsToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.5 V6
350 V6
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6vsLexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
3.5 V6
2.0 T5
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.5 V6
C 300
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20143.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
P250
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster