Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsTesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Tesla Model 3

P50 50 kWh

261 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2017-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Most powerful
    261 hp
    195 kW
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Power
250hp186kW
261hp195kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,685kg3,715lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
46.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
21.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
1,072km666mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,954mm195in
4,694mm185in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,933mm76in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,875mm113in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
425L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
-
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
21.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
261 hp
195 kW

Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh has 11 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
261 hp
195 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Power
261 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWh
Power
250 hp
186 kW
261 hp
195 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
6.6 s
5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,072 km
666 mi
-
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
P50 50 kWh
60 kWh
VS
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
P50 50 kWh
Standard Plus 54 kWh
VS
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWhvsTeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Standard Plus 54 kWh
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
P50 50 kWh
E 350d V6
VS
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350d V6
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
P50 50 kWh
2.0 TSI
VS
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWhvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
P50 50 kWh
730d
VS
TeslaModel 3P50 50 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G11)730d
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
P250
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Tesla Model 3 P50 50 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster