Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range1,072 km666 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km594mi Calculated | 1,072km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.6 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 957 km 594 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,072 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 594 mi | 1,072 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























