Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,685 kg
    3,715 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,072 km
    666 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
23.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
952km592mi
Calculated
1,072km666mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,626mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,594mm63in
Trunk volume-
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
74L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
23.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,072 km
666 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
952 km
592 mi
1,072 km
666 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
159 g/km
Trunk score
-
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 50 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 40 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
2.0
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
6.0 V12 Classic
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster