Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220dvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,088 km676 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 194hp145kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,375kg5,236lb | - |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,020km634mi Calculated | 1,088km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 194 hp 145 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 7.5 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 1,020 km 634 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 194 hp 145 kW | 7.5 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 194 hp 145 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,020 km 634 mi | 1,088 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























