Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsMaybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2012-2015
VS

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010

6.0 V12

630 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,875 kg
    4,134 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    293 hp/t
    219 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.9 L/100 km
    13.9 mpg US
    16.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
550hp410kW
630hp470kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,875kg4,134lb
2,780kg6,129lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
3,380kg7,452lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
11.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km376mi
Calculated
696km433mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
5,980cc365cu in
Length
4,981mm196in
6,171mm243in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,909mm115in
3,827mm151in
Front track
1,549mm61in
1,675mm66in
Rear track
1,563mm62in
1,695mm67in
Trunk volume
540L
605L
Max trunk volume
963L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
70L
110L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.6 s
14.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
206 km/h
128 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 80 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 80 hp (60 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.6 s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V125.1 s

Although Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has more power, Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 4.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
604 km
376 mi
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
696 km
433 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.6 s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
550 hp
410 kW
630 hp
470 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Lightness
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
604 km
376 mi
696 km
433 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km27.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi44.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year4,148 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Is 905 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Has 80 hp more
  • Has 320 Nm more
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X250) R-S 5.0 V8
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
6.0 V12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V12
6.0 W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
R-S 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V12
V 6.2 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.0 V12
6.3 FSI W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 vs Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster