Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8vsMaybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X250)

R 5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2009-2011
VS

Maybach 62 S (V240)

6.0 V12

612 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,891 kg
    4,169 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    270 hp/t
    201 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.7 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12

  • Most powerful
    612 hp
    456 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    671 km
    417 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Power
510hp380kW
612hp456kW
Torque
625Nm461lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,891kg4,169lb
2,780kg6,129lb
Gross weight
2,330kg5,137lb
3,380kg7,452lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
56.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
14.2s
Calculated
16.2s
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
331Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
560km348mi
Calculated
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
5,980cc365cu in
Length
4,961mm195in
6,160mm243in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,909mm115in
3,827mm151in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,675mm66in
Rear track
1,571mm62in
1,695mm67in
Ground clearance-
156mm6in
Trunk volume
500L
605L
Max trunk volume
923L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
70L
110L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.2 s
16.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
181 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
612 hp
456 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 has 102 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: 102 hp (76 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
1,891 kg
4,169 lb
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V84.9 s
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V125.2 s

Although Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 has more power, Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
16.4 L/100 km
14.3 mpg US
17.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 and Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
560 km
348 mi
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
671 km
417 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
612 hp
456 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,160 mm
242.5 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
16.4 L/100 km
14.3 mpg US
17.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
4.9 s
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
16.4 L/100 km
14.3 mpg US
17.2 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
16.4 L/100 km
14.3 mpg US
17.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12
Power
510 hp
380 kW
612 hp
456 kW
Torque
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,891 kg
4,169 lb
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
Fuel consumption
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
16.4 L/100 km
14.3 mpg US
17.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,961 mm
195.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,160 mm
242.5 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
560 km
348 mi
671 km
417 mi
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
270 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.88 LC100 km28.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.20 LC100 mi46.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,281 LC/year4,305 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8

  • Is 889 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12

  • Has 102 hp more
  • Has 375 Nm more
  • Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 105 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)AMG S 63 V8
R 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
R 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
6.0 V12
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
R 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
6.0 V12
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.0 V12
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
Jaguar XF (X250) R 5.0 V8 vs Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster