Bentley Continental Flying Spur
Car comparison
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VvsMaybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaybach 62 S (V240)
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption24.6 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best economy score63/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Lightest2,475 kg5,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,780kg6,129lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 3,380kg7,452lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 56.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 16.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK | 24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 5,307mm209in | 6,160mm243in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,479mm58in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | 3,827mm151in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,695mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 605L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 110L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
- Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 4,800-5,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 has 52 hp more than Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V and Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 2,780 kg 6,129 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 5.2 s |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 has more power, Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.2 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | Maybach62 S (V240)6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,780 kg 6,129 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 46.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,305 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Has 47 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 350 Nm more
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























