Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8vsLexus LS IV 600h V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS IV
600h V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,842 kg4,061 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lexus LS IV 600h V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range903 km561 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | LexusLS IV600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,842kg4,061lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 556km345mi Calculated | 903km561mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 5,030mm198in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,970mm117in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,571mm62in | 1,620mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 420L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS IV 600h V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | LexusLS IV600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has 22 hp more than Lexus LS IV 600h V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS IV 600h V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Lexus LS IV 600h V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS IV 600h V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 556 km 345 mi |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 903 km 561 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IV600h V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IV600h V8 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS IV 600h V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IV600h V8 | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | LexusLS IV600h V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 556 km 345 mi | 903 km 561 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 | Lexus LS IV 600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.05 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,308 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 513 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus LS IV 600h V8
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 348 km (216 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























