Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsSkoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024
VS

Skoda Superb IV Combi

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,138 km
    707 mi
  • Largest trunk
    716 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
204hp152kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,746kg3,849lb
Gross weight-
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.9s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
28.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
869km540mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,964mm195in
4,902mm193in
Width-
1,849mm73in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,506mm59in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,568mm62in
Ground clearance-
139mm5in
Trunk volume
716L
690L
Max trunk volume
1,695L
1,920L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
28.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
1,746 kg
3,849 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d7.8 s
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,138 km
707 mi
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
869 km
540 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.4 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,902 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,746 kg
3,849 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,902 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
869 km
540 mi
Trunk score
716 L
25.3 cu ft
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 26 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI

  • Is 49 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C9)2.0 TDI
2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsCupraLeon SportstourerFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0d
40 TDI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0d
C 200
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster