Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,245 km774 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score93/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Largest trunk716 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,245km774mi Calculated | 1,138km707mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,964mm195in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 716L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,695L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 36 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,245 km 774 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,138 km 707 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,245 km 774 mi | 1,138 km 707 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 716 L 25.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 176 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























