Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dvsSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Skoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

Fastest top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Most powerful
180 hp
134 kW
Highest torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
124 g/km
Best estimated range
1,375 km
854 mi
Best overall score
60/100
Best performance score
47/100
Best economy score
94/100

Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.8 s
Lightest
1,607 kg
3,543 lb
Best power-to-weight
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Largest trunk
610 L
Best practicality score
88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power	180hp134kW	180hp134kW
Torque	430Nm317lb-ft	280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight	1,720kg3,792lb	1,607kg3,543lb
Gross weight	-	2,092kg4,612lb
Top speed	221 km/h 137 mph	216 km/h 134 mph
To 99% top speed	86.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated	73.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.8s	7.8s
0-200 km/h	40.8s Calculated	38.9s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.3s Calculated	7.4s Calculated
Fuel consumption	4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK	6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	-	8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	-	5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.4s Calculated	15.7s Calculated
Power-to-weight	105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated	112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated	174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,375km854mi Calculated	809km503mi Calculated
Displacement	1,999cc122cu in	1,798cc110cu in
Length	4,955mm195in	4,687mm185in
Width	1,987mm78in	1,814mm71in
Height	1,496mm59in	1,531mm60in
Wheelbase	2,960mm117in	2,680mm106in
Front track	1,605mm63in	1,538mm61in
Rear track	1,607mm63in	1,539mm61in
Ground clearance	116mm5in	171mm7in
Trunk volume	565L	610L
Max trunk volume	1,700L	1,740L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	66L	55L
CO2 emissions	124g/km	158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dSkoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	4,000 rpm	1,750-2,500 rpm	4,250 rpm
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	4,500-6,200 rpm	1,350-4,500 rpm	6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.3 s	7.4 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.8 s	7.8 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	40.8 s	38.9 s
Top speed	221 km/h 137 mph	216 km/h 134 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.8 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	7.2 s	6.9 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.8 s	10.3 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.8 s	13.2 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.4 s	15.7 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	143 km/h 89 mph	148 km/h 92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	180 hp 134 kW
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	180 hp 134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	430 Nm 317 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	280 Nm 207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	1,720 kg 3,792 lb
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	1,607 kg 3,543 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	221 km/h 137 mph
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	216 km/h 134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	8.8 s
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	1,375 km 854 mi
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	809 km 503 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	180 hp 134 kW	8.8 s	221 km/h 137 mph
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	180 hp 134 kW	7.8 s	216 km/h 134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.8 s
Top speed 221 km/h 137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	565 L 20.0 cu ft
Length	4,955 mm 195.1 in
Height	1,496 mm 58.9 in

SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	7.8 s
Top speed 216 km/h 134 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	610 L 21.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,531 mm 60.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.8 s
Top speed 221 km/h 137 mph

4.8 L/100 km

49.0 mpg US

58.9 mpg UK

SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	7.8 s
Top speed 216 km/h 134 mph

6.8 L/100 km

34.6 mpg US

41.5 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK	8.8 s
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK	7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp	4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI	112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp	6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d

SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI

Power

180 hp

134 kW

180 hp

134 kW

Torque

430 Nm

317 lb-ft

280 Nm

207 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.8 s

7.8 s

Top speed

221 km/h

137 mph

216 km/h

134 mph

Lightness

1,720 kg

3,792 lb

1,607 kg

3,543 lb

Fuel consumption

4.8 L/100 km

49.0 mpg US

58.9 mpg UK

6.8 L/100 km

34.6 mpg US

41.5 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	565 L 20.0 cu ft
Length	4,955 mm 195.1 in
Height	1,496 mm 58.9 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	610 L 21.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,531 mm 60.3 in

Range score

1,375 km

854 mi

809 km

503 mi

CO2 score

124 g/km

158 g/km

Trunk score

565 L

20.0 cu ft

610 L

21.5 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

105 hp/t

78 kW/t

9.6 kg/hp

112 hp/t

84 kW/t

8.9 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d	Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI
Consumption	4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK	6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	8.40 LC100 km	11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	13.52 LC100 mi	19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	720 L190 US gal158 UK gal	1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,260 LC/year	1,785 LC/year