Car comparison

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018
VS

Skoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    138 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,404 km
    872 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,810kg3,990lb
1,607kg3,543lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,092kg4,612lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
77.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
73.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
38.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,404km872mi
Calculated
809km503mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,798cc110cu in
Length
4,943mm195in
4,687mm185in
Width
1,874mm74in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,531mm60in
Wheelbase
2,912mm115in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,627mm64in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,618mm64in
1,539mm61in
Ground clearance-
171mm7in
Trunk volume
565L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,680L
1,740L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
73L
55L
CO2 emissions
138g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDISkoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIPowerTorque
  • AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
38.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
1,607 kg
3,543 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.8 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.9 s
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDISkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
1,607 kg
3,543 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,687 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in
Range score
1,404 km
872 mi
809 km
503 mi
CO2 score
138 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDISkoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 595 km (370 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

  • Is 203 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 2.0 TDI
Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI vs Skoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster