Skoda Superb III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,435 km892 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,714kg3,779lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 39.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,435km892mi Calculated | 1,222km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 143g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 39.3 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,714 kg 3,779 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,435 km 892 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,222 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,714 kg 3,779 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,435 km 892 mi | 1,222 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 143 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 179 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 213 km (132 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























