Skoda Superb III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIvsRenault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman Estate
2.0 Blue dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,435 km892 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,638kg3,611lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,241kg4,941lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 38.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,435km892mi Calculated | 1,041km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,809mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,681L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 38.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 1,638 kg 3,611 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 9.0 s |
Although Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,435 km 892 mi |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 1,041 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.0 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,638 kg 3,611 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,435 km 892 mi | 1,041 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI | Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 103 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 394 km (245 mi) more estimated range
- Has 157 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























