Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,222 km759 mi
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,714kg3,779lb |
| Gross weight | 2,014kg4,440lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 39.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,222km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 143g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 39.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,714 kg 3,779 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,222 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,714 kg 3,779 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,222 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 143 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























