Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20dvsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2020
VS

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Lightest
    1,637 kg
    3,609 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    112 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,222 km
    759 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
180hp134kW
184hp137kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,714kg3,779lb
1,637kg3,609lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
2,097kg4,623lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
83.6s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
39.3s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,222km759mi
Calculated
1,038km645mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,955mm195in
4,689mm185in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,496mm59in
1,452mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,544mm61in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume-
610L
Max trunk volume-
1,740L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
55L
CO2 emissions
143g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20dSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.3 s
36.8 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
1,714 kg
3,779 lb
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,637 kg
3,609 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
221 km/h
137 mph
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d8.5 s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
1,222 km
759 mi
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,038 km
645 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.7 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.5 s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
7.7 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,714 kg
3,779 lb
1,637 kg
3,609 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Range score
1,222 km
759 mi
1,038 km
645 mi
CO2 score
143 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20dSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 184 km (115 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 77 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
RS 2.0 TDI
520i
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i
20d
20d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X260)20d
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20172.0 TDI
20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
RS 2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
20d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
20d
2.0 D4
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsVolvoV902.0 D4
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
20d
1.6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20dvsSubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d vs Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster