Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk716 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,856kg4,092lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | - |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,065km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | - |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 611L | 716L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 1,695L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,065 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,065 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | 716 L 25.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 350 km (218 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























