Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,800 kg3,968 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk716 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,856kg4,092lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,065km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 716L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,695L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,065 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,065 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 716 L 25.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 350 km (218 mi) more estimated range
- Has 226 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























