Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Lightest
    1,731 kg
    3,816 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,468 km
    912 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,731kg3,816lb
1,856kg4,092lb
Gross weight
2,237kg4,932lb
-
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
81.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
80.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
31.6s
Calculated
32.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,468km912mi
Calculated
1,065km661mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,964mm195in
Width
1,864mm73in
-
Height
1,477mm58in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
-
Trunk volume
660L
716L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,695L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.6 s
32.6 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,731 kg
3,816 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,856 kg
4,092 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
233 km/h
145 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,468 km
912 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,065 km
661 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
233 km/h
145 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
8.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,731 kg
3,816 lb
1,856 kg
4,092 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
1,468 km
912 mi
1,065 km
661 mi
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster