Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024
VS

Skoda Octavia IV Scout

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,567 kg
    3,455 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,856kg4,092lb
1,567kg3,455lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
80.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
64.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
32.6s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,065km661mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,964mm195in
4,703mm185in
Width-
1,829mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,481mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,686mm106in
Front track
1,602mm63in
-
Rear track
1,604mm63in
-
Trunk volume
716L
640L
Max trunk volume
1,695L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI3,600-4,200 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.6 s
28.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,856 kg
4,092 lb
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
1,567 kg
3,455 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
8.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.0 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,856 kg
4,092 lb
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Range score
1,065 km
661 mi
-
Trunk score
716 L
25.3 cu ft
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI

  • Is 289 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster