Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dvsRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Renault Megane IV Grandtour

GT 1.6 Energy dCi

165 hp1598 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,320 km
    820 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi

  • Lightest
    1,425 kg
    3,142 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    124 g/km
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
Power
180hp134kW
165hp123kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,425kg3,142lb
Gross weight-
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
87.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
78.9s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
42.7s
Calculated
44.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,320km820mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,955mm195in
4,626mm182in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,496mm59in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,712mm107in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,586mm62in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
565L
521L
Max trunk volume
1,700L
1,504L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
47L
CO2 emissions
132g/km
124g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCiPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
42.7 s
44.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
165 hp
123 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has 15 hp more than Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
1,425 kg
3,142 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
219 km/h
136 mph
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d8.9 s
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi8.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,320 km
820 mi
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
165 hp
123 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
Power
165 hp
123 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
Power
165 hp
123 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.9 s
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCi
Power
180 hp
134 kW
165 hp
123 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
Fuel consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,320 km
820 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
132 g/km
124 g/km
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi
Consumption5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.75 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.08 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used750 L198 US gal165 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,313 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 320 km (199 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 44 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi

  • Is 345 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy dCi
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0d
1.6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsSubaruLevorg1.6
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy dCivsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d vs Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy dCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster