Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

RS 2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2019
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    246 km/h
    153 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,486 kg
    3,276 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,088 km
    676 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,486kg3,276lb
1,705kg3,759lb
Gross weight
1,946kg4,290lb
-
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
68.8s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
73.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
26.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km450mi
Calculated
1,088km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,689mm185in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
110mm4in
Trunk volume
610L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
74L
CO2 emissions
156g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI5,000-6,200 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
26.1 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
1,486 kg
3,276 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
1,705 kg
3,759 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
246 km/h
153 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI6.7 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.07.1 s

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
725 km
450 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
1,088 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
246 km/h
153 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
7.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.1 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,486 kg
3,276 lb
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
725 km
450 mi
1,088 km
676 mi
CO2 score
156 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 219 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 364 km (226 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
530i
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)530i
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)45 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvoV902.0 T5
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
25t
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster