Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,245 km774 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score93/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,245km774mi Calculated | 1,088km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | - | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,700L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 7.1 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,245 km 774 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,245 km 774 mi | 1,088 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























