Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P250vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 62.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 21.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,245km774mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 21.9 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,245 km 774 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 91 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























