Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300dvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 65.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 103mm4in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | - | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 2,650 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 6.5 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























