Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P250vsJaguar XF (X260) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,158 km719 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,536 kg3,386 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,536kg3,386lb | 1,733kg3,821lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 900km559mi Calculated | 1,158km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 900 km 559 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,158 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXF (X260)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 900 km 559 mi | 1,158 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 | Jaguar XF (X260) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 197 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 258 km (160 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























