Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P250vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,536 kg3,386 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,536kg3,386lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 900km559mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 410L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 900 km 559 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 900 km 559 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 199 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 52 km (33 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























