Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,347 km837 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 75.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,077km669mi Calculated | 1,347km837mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,077 km 669 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,347 km 837 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,077 km 669 mi | 1,347 km 837 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























