Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6vsJaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
S 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range860 km535 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 778km483mi Calculated | 860km535mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 204g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has 40 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 778 km 483 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 860 km 535 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 778 km 483 mi | 860 km 535 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 204 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 km (51 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























