Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 400 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 50.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 778km483mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 333 hp 248 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6 and Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 5.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 778 km 483 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 778 km 483 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 3.0 V6
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 400 V6
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























