Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range735 km457 mi
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,536 kg3,386 lb
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,536kg3,386lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 735km457mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,678mm184in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 394L | 414L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,275L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.7 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.9 s |
Although Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 667 km 414 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 735 km 457 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 735 km 457 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 394 L 13.9 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 24 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Has 4 hp more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























