Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range735 km457 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 735km457mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 has 4 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 6.0 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 714 km 444 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 735 km 457 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 735 km 457 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























