Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,536 kg3,386 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,536kg3,386lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 61.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 22.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,200km746mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 394L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,275L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 22.7 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.7 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,200 km 746 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,536 kg 3,386 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,200 km 746 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 394 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 533 km (331 mi) more estimated range
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 204 kg lighter
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























