Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions111 g/km
- Best estimated range1,333 km828 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | 1,333km828mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,835mm112in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | 111g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 685 km 426 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,333 km 828 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | 1,333 km 828 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | 111 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 648 km (403 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 51 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























