Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsKia Optima IV · Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2018
VS

Kia Optima IV · Facelift 2018

2.0 T-GDI

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,650 kg
    3,638 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,077 km
    669 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
240hp179kW
238hp177kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,650kg3,638lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
19.5s
Calculated
24.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,077km669mi
Calculated
753km468mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
4,855mm191in
Width
1,967mm77in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,805mm110in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,607mm63in
Rear track
1,603mm63in
1,614mm64in
Trunk volume
455L
510L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
70L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dKia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,350-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.5 s
24.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
238 hp
177 kW

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 2 hp more than Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d6.1 s
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,077 km
669 mi
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
753 km
468 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
238 hp
177 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.1 s
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,077 km
669 mi
753 km
468 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
-
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XE (X760) 2.0dKia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 147 Nm more
  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 324 km (201 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Kia Optima IV 2.0 T-GDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
P250
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
2.0 T-GDI
2.0 D5
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsVolvoS902.0 D5
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T-GDI
1.8 TCe
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsRenaultTalisman1.8 TCe
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
2.0 T-GDI
Redline 550T
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T-GDI
2.0 TDI
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0d
E 300
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
2.0d
C 300
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
2.0 T-GDI
45 TFSI
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d vs Kia Optima IV · Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster