Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range1,077 km669 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,077km669mi Calculated | 957km594mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,619mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 6.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,077 km 669 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 957 km 594 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,077 km 669 mi | 957 km 594 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























