Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsMaserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017 3.0d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Ghibli III (M157) · Facelift 2017
3.0d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.8s Calculated | 22.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,971mm196in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,945mm77in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,998mm118in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,653mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.8 s | 22.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | MaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 335 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Ghibli III (M157) Facelift 2017 3.0d V6
- Has 235 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 186 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























